|
This article was published in Pharmaceutical Technology Europe in November 2004. The article is written by Harald Stahl, who is the senior Pharmaceutical Technologist at GEA Pharma Systems, Mauchener Strasse 14, D-79379 Müllheim, Germany.
Tel.: +49 7631 701 614
Fax: +49 7631 701 669
Email: hstahl@niro-pharma-systems.com
|
There are a number of granulation technologies available to pharmaceutical manufacturers. Given the importance of granulation in the production of oral dosage forms, this paper offers advice on various process and looks at the implications of two different applications.
Granulation is one of the most important unit operations in the production of pharmaceutical oral dosage forms. However, there are many different technologies each having different strengths and weaknesses. Most companies choose which one to use simply based on their own experience.This article introduces different processes, compares them objectively and offers unbiased advice on the merits of each system. It then looks at the implications of selection on two different applications.
Granulation methods:
Comparison of granulation processes
Tables I – III provide a brief overview of the implications of particular granulation methods. All information shown assumes ‘normal’ products. Some special products may behave differently.
Table I Comparison of processes — general aspects |
|
Option 1 Single pot |
Option 2
High shear force mixer and FBD |
Option 3 Top spray granulation |
Option 4 Continuous top spray process |
Option 5 Spray drying |
Option 6 Pelletizing |
| Scales available |
LS |
LS |
LS |
(TS) |
TS |
(TS) |
| Laboratory scale (LS) |
TS |
TS |
TS |
PS |
PS |
PS |
| Technical scale (TS) |
PS |
PS |
PS |
|
|
|
| Production scale (PS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Definition of batch |
++ |
++ |
++ |
Material container |
Material container |
Material container |
| Scalability |
+ |
+ |
+ |
++ (down?) |
++(down?) |
++(down?) |
| Need for special building |
Weight |
Height |
Height |
Integration into building |
Height |
Integration into building |
| Energy/kg (5) |
>0.25 kW/kg |
>0.25 kW/kg |
>0.37 kW/kg |
>0.37 kW/kg |
>7.5 kW/kg |
>0.5 kW/kg |
| Yield |
>99.5% |
>99% |
>99% |
>99% |
>99% |
>98% |
| (1) Granulation with 10% granulation liquid (TS15%) |
| (2) Granulation with 15% granulation liquid (TS15%) |
| (3) Mix all components of formulation in liquid form (TS20%); drying step at the end of primary production can be saved |
| (4) Granulation with 20% granulation liquid (TS15%) |
| (5) Only drying energy |
| |
| Key: ++ very good; + good; +- fair; - poor; -- very poor |
|
Table II Comparison of processes — formulation aspects. |
|
Option 1 Single pot |
Option 2
High shear force mixer and FBD |
Option 3 Top spray granulation |
Option 4 Continuous top spray process |
Option 5 Spray drying |
Option 6 Pelletizing |
Containment |
++ |
+ |
++ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Handle organic
solvents |
++ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Heat sensitive
materials |
++ |
+ |
+ |
(+) |
(+)+(-) |
(+) |
Limitations by different formulations |
None
(behaviour of material if exposed to microwaves) |
None |
PSD of raw materials |
PSD and flow properties of raw materials |
Fine grades of raw materials required if worked from suspensions |
Limited |
Amount of granulation liquid required |
8–15% |
8–15% |
15–30% |
15–30% |
>100% |
15–50% |
Table III Comparison of granule characteristics.
|
|
Option 1 Single pot |
Option 2
High shear force mixer and FBD |
Option 3 Top spray granulation |
Option 4 Continuous top spray process |
Option 5 Spray drying |
Option 6 Pelletizing |
Dust/fine particles |
<12% |
<8% |
<5% |
<3% |
<1% |
None |
| D50: PSD |
100-800 μm |
120-800 μm |
150-600 μm |
120-400 μm |
150-300 μm |
800-2000 μm |
| Span (6): |
2.5-3 |
2.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
1.5 |
<1 |
Homogeneity |
+ |
+ |
+ |
(+) |
++ |
+ |
Flow properties |
+ |
+(+) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
++ |
Bulk density |
0.7 g/cm3 |
0.8 g/cm3 |
0.7 g/cm3 |
0.7 g/cm3 |
0.6 g/cm3 |
Near physical
density |
Dissolution |
+ |
+ |
++ |
++ |
++ |
- |
|
(6) Span=(D90D10)/D50
|
Production scenario 1
A dedicated plant for the production
of 1000 tonnes of granules of a
water-based formulation.
The
amounts of granulation liquid are
estimated as shown in Table I. Further, it is assumed that cleaning is
required once a week for only a few
hours because it is a dedicated installation;
the plant is operated in three
shifts for 5 days each week; and the
plant achieves 20 productive hours per
day and 200 productive days per year.
Working on these assumptions,
5 tonnes of granules must be produced
per day.Table IV shows the
results for the different production
scenarios.To complete this table (for
the batch machines), the batch times
were evaluated.These are based on
customers' experiences and calculations
regarding the drying capacity of
the different equipment. Some materials
with special granulation/drying
properties may achieve entirely different
batch times. By calculating the
number of batches per day, the
required batch size of 5 tonnes of
granules per day was determined.
For the single pot option it was not
possible to achieve the requested
throughput using only one machine.
For all continuous processes, equipment
with the requested throughput
is available.To include the necessary
investment costs in the table is
extremely complicated as this
depends on many other factors in
addition to the granulation equipment
and needs, and must, therefore,
be evaluated carefully, case by case.
Table IV Key figures of production scenario 1. |
|
Option 1 Single pot |
Option 2
High shear force mixer and FBD |
Option 3 Top spray granulation |
Option 4 Continuous top spray process |
Option 5 Spray drying |
Option 6 Pelletizing |
Equipment
scale |
1200 L (3 plants) |
High shear 2000 L; fluid bed of adequate scale |
Product container size: 3200 L |
250 kg/h |
250 kg/h |
250 kg/h |
| Batch size |
417 kg |
715 kg |
1000 kg |
- |
- |
- |
| Batch time |
5 h |
2 h 50 min |
4 h |
– |
– |
– |
Throughput |
|
|
|
250 kg/h |
250 kg/h |
250 kg/h |
Production scenario 2
Installation for the production of four
different water-based granulated
products, each with a capacity of
32 tonnes per year.
The amounts of
granulation liquid are estimated as
shown in Table I.The process length
for each product should be 1 week. It
is also assumed that cleaning must be
done only at the end of each process,
which means that Friday is not a productive
day. Further assumptions are
that the plant is operated in two
shifts for 5 days each week and that
the plant achieves 16 productive
hours per day and 200 productive
days per year.
Table V Key figures of production scenario 2. |
|
Option 1 Single pot |
Option 2
High shear force mixer and FBD |
Option 3 Top spray granulation |
Option 4 Continuous top spray process |
Option 5 Spray drying |
Option 6 Pelletizing |
Equipment
scale |
400 |
High shear 600 L; fluid bed of adequate scale |
Product container size:600 L |
50 kg/h |
50 kg/h |
50 kg/h |
| Batch size |
160 kg |
240 kg |
200 kg |
- |
- |
- |
| Batch time |
5 h |
3 h |
4 h |
– |
– |
– |
Throughput |
|
|
|
50 kg/h |
50 kg/h |
50 kg/h |
|