PAT based Cycle Development

Print     Send link

Creating the recipe

  • Estimation of required chamber pressure and initial shelf temperature for PD
  • Estimation of optimum shelf temperature at SD and final desorption rate for residual moisture

First run

Conclusions

  • Use of a PAT tool allows direct calculation of required shelf temperature and estimation of average drying time
  • More complex calculations allow creation of a model for online determination of drying progress
  • PAT-Tools accelerate also time based cycle development

Optimized run (Main Drying)

Scale up run (Main Drying)

Conclusions

  • Due to the flexibility of process control, measurement of ice temperature allows safe scale up ("right first time")
  • Process parameters which have been fixed before (due to validation), can now be varied to maintain full product security
  • Using of PAT-Tools reduces the risk of scale up failure
  • The impact of lower performance of the freeze dryer is minimized, cycle length would be automatically extended

Compatibility with other procedures

Conclusions

  • End point detected by gas moisture measurement equals end point detected by ice temperature
  • Combination of independent PAT-Tools improves significance of recipe edge values

Advantages of PAT Tools for Cycle development

  • Reduction of required test runs for optimum recipe
    • Rapid cycle development
  • Increased scientific output of test runs leads to improved understanding of the process itself
    • Improved process knowledge
  • Reduced expenditure of time due to automated process control
    • Improved R&D efficiency

Advantages of PAT Tools for Production

  • Improved process understanding supports future validation procedures of production lines
    • Increased scale up ratio
    • Reduced time-to-market
  • PAT control algorithms can easily implemented into control software (PAT meets GAMP)
    • Improved production safety

Recommended Features for an Cycle Development Unit

Pilot and Production Plant require same PAT tooling e.g.

  • TIce-Sensor ("Combined Instruments")
  • Cold Plasma Spectrometer
  • Vapor flow sensor

Pilot and Production Plant require same equipment

  • Capacitance pressure transmitters
  • Same Thermo sensors (PT100/Thermocouples)
  • Same industrial standard

1st principles model creation can be accelerated by use of archived process data

  • Compatibility of Pilot FD to archived cycle data might require "historical" Sensor equipment e.g.
  • Pirani pressure gauge
  • Thermocouples AND PT100

Reduction of design depending influences e.g.

  • Adjustable process parameters (high&low equipment performance)
  • Adjustable flow conditions
  • Reduction of edge effect by temperature controlled radiation shields
  • Increase of Upscale Ratio allows reduction of required test material and general R&D-efforts

Redundant process control

  • Redundant Installation of Instruments at Production Freeze Dryer
  • Improvement of Process Model by two independent PAT-methods e.g.
  • Ice temperature measurement & Cold Plasma

If you are interested in any further material please contact:

GEA Lyophil GmbH
Research Engineering
Georg Frinke
georg.frinke@gea-lyophil.com
+49-(0)-2233-6999-210

 

PAT based Cycle Development Advantages of PAT-Technologies

 
Request Information
If you are interested in learning more about a particular product and/or service offered by GEA Process Engineering Inc, please use this form to contact us,

Request more information Click here to request more information

 Back Top of page Top of page